Convenimus ergo es: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|confcall|}}[[Otto Büchstein|Büchstein]]’s famous maxim, loosely translated as [[I am in a meeting, therefore you exist|I am in a meeting, therefore ''you'' exist]], which he formulated to disprove central thesis from [[Descartes]]’  ''[[Discourse on the Method]]'' and thus establish the ''non''-existence of an omnipotent benevolent god, For no such deity could exist in a universe where [[all hands conference call]]s are an inevitability.
{{a|confcall|}}[[Otto Büchstein|Büchstein]]’s famous maxim, loosely translated as [[We are meeting, therefore you exist|we are in a meeting, therefore ''you'' exist]], which he formulated to disprove central thesis from [[Descartes]]’  ''[[Discourse on the Method]]'' and thus establish the ''non''-existence of an omnipotent benevolent god, for no such deity could exist in a universe where [[all-hands conference call]]s are an inevitability.


If there is such a thing in our world as a business meeting<ref>Translators note: Modern translations of this work render “[[meeting|business meeting]]” as [[all-hands conference call]]</ref> and take it from me, there most definitely is — then it is not, as [[Descartes]] contended, self-evidently true that the only certain thing in the universe is the incorporeal “I” as a ''thinking thing'' (“[[res cogitans]]”). “''You''” must also exist, as a ''talking thing'' (“[[res verbositans]]”), and so must the [[project manager]] as an ''action-assigning thing'' (“[[res bossitans]]”)
If there is such a thing in our world as a business meeting<ref>Translators note: Modern translations of this work render “[[meeting|business meeting]]” as [[all-hands conference call]]</ref> and take it from me, there most definitely is — then it is not, as [[Descartes]] contended, self-evidently true that the only certain thing in the universe is the incorporeal “I” as a ''thinking thing'' (“[[res cogitans]]”). “''You''” must also exist, as a ''talking thing'' (“[[res verbositans]]”), and so must the [[project manager]] as an ''action-assigning thing'' (“[[res bossitans]]”)

Revision as of 14:13, 25 March 2019

Conference Call Anatomy™
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Büchstein’s famous maxim, loosely translated as we are in a meeting, therefore you exist, which he formulated to disprove central thesis from DescartesDiscourse on the Method and thus establish the non-existence of an omnipotent benevolent god, for no such deity could exist in a universe where all-hands conference calls are an inevitability.

If there is such a thing in our world as a business meeting[1] and take it from me, there most definitely is — then it is not, as Descartes contended, self-evidently true that the only certain thing in the universe is the incorporeal “I” as a thinking thing (“res cogitans”). “You” must also exist, as a talking thing (“res verbositans”), and so must the project manager as an action-assigning thing (“res bossitans”)

See also

References

  1. Translators note: Modern translations of this work render “business meeting” as all-hands conference call