83,240
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}} | {{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}} | ||
An observant negotiator (is there any other kind?) handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section {{isdaprov|3(a)(vi)}}. The framers of the {{isdama}} obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new no-agency rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}. | |||
But you don’t need a bespoke no-agency rep if you’re on a {2002ma}}, if that’s what you’re wondering. | |||
{{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}} | {{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}} | ||