Template:Failure to pay or deliver capsule: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{g}}{{a|negotiation|}}Failure to pay is the classic event of default in a financial {{t|contract}}. There is no more profound indication that you may be unable to hon..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|negotiation|}}[[Failure to pay]] is the classic [[event of default]] in a financial {{t|contract}}. There is no more profound indication that you may be unable to honour your obligations to pay a sum of money that the fact you have actually not done so. Almost all close-outs will derive from some kind of failure to pay or insolvency — but don’t let that knowledge stop your credit department insisting on a four month negotiation about [[ratings downgrade|ratings downgrade trigger]]s. | |||
Contrast with a [[failure to deliver]] which in ''some'' {{t|contract}}s<ref>eg, and {{isdama}}.</ref> is tantamount in outrage to a [[failure to pay]], but in ''others'' is just one of those things that we accept, sort out, and move on with. For example, [[stock lending]] transactions, where a failure to ''lend'' {{gmslaprov|Securities}}, or ''return'' {{gmslaprov|Securities}} or {{gmslaprov|Collateral}}, might be just one of those things: the result of ordinary market fluctuations, where settlement failures are common, and one often relies on someone else — or a chain of someone elses — settling the necessary {{gmslaprov|Securities}} into you so you can settle them to your loan counterparty. | Contrast with a [[failure to deliver]] which in ''some'' {{t|contract}}s<ref>eg, and {{isdama}}.</ref> is tantamount in outrage to a [[failure to pay]], but in ''others'' is just one of those things that we accept, sort out, and move on with. For example, [[stock lending]] transactions, where a failure to ''lend'' {{gmslaprov|Securities}}, or ''return'' {{gmslaprov|Securities}} or {{gmslaprov|Collateral}}, might be just one of those things: the result of ordinary market fluctuations, where settlement failures are common, and one often relies on someone else — or a chain of someone elses — settling the necessary {{gmslaprov|Securities}} into you so you can settle them to your loan counterparty. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:30, 16 June 2021
|
Negotiation Anatomy™
|
Failure to pay is the classic event of default in a financial contract. There is no more profound indication that you may be unable to honour your obligations to pay a sum of money that the fact you have actually not done so. Almost all close-outs will derive from some kind of failure to pay or insolvency — but don’t let that knowledge stop your credit department insisting on a four month negotiation about ratings downgrade triggers.
Contrast with a failure to deliver which in some contracts[1] is tantamount in outrage to a failure to pay, but in others is just one of those things that we accept, sort out, and move on with. For example, stock lending transactions, where a failure to lend Securities, or return Securities or Collateral, might be just one of those things: the result of ordinary market fluctuations, where settlement failures are common, and one often relies on someone else — or a chain of someone elses — settling the necessary Securities into you so you can settle them to your loan counterparty.
See also
- Failure to deliver
- Event of default
- Failure to Pay or Deliver under the ISDA
- Failure to pay or deliver under the 2010 GMSLA, mini close-out and all that good stuff.
- ↑ eg, and ISDA Master Agreement.