Quod erat demonstrandum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Quod erat demonstrandum. A jolly good {{tag|Latin}} expression to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or witty. But steer clear of it if you are tryin..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Quod erat demonstrandum]]. A jolly good | {{a|latin|}}“[[Quod erat demonstrandum]]”. A jolly good [[Latin]] expression, meaning “the very thing that you were trying to prove”; to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or be witty. But steer clear of it if you are trying to inform, because, [[Q.E.D.]], those without a classical education won’t understand it and may grow restive. | ||
But it was in the ''Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy''. | |||
:''Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God. | |||
:''The argument goes something like this: “I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.” | |||
:''“But,” says Man, “The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. [[Q.E.D.]].” | |||
:''“Oh dear,” says God, “I hadn’t thought of that,” and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic. | |||
Also, my [[secret Latin advisor]] tells me, “demonstrandum” is a [[gerundive]]. Which is nice. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
The JC’s guide to pithy Latin adages
|
“Quod erat demonstrandum”. A jolly good Latin expression, meaning “the very thing that you were trying to prove”; to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or be witty. But steer clear of it if you are trying to inform, because, Q.E.D., those without a classical education won’t understand it and may grow restive.
But it was in the Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
- Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
- The argument goes something like this: “I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.”
- “But,” says Man, “The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. Q.E.D..”
- “Oh dear,” says God, “I hadn’t thought of that,” and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
Also, my secret Latin advisor tells me, “demonstrandum” is a gerundive. Which is nice.