Template:Repo - FWMD: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fwmdtt|nickname=Repo|imagetype=jpg|title=[[Global Master Repurchase Agreement]]|tagline=Let's go get sushi and not pay!|documentation=Standard 2000 {{t|GMRA}}. Vague where it needs to be and not heavily negotiated. (5)|booklets=Nope. (1)|customisability=Well, you can have fun doing a [[stock loan]] under a [[repo]] master and vice versa if you must but otherwise, no, very standard. (3)|asset classes=Bonds, cash. Equities at a stretch. (3)|amendability=Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but would you, unless MiFID changed and you had to? (4)|transferability=Niente. Bilateral contract. You could Novate, but really why would you? (2)|tenor=Short - typically no more than a month. But at least it ''has'' a tenor. So better than a [[stock loan]].(3)|leverage=Fully collateralised, so nope. (1)|collateral= Yes. (6)|longevity=Repos have been around for ages and they'll be around for ages. (10)|frightometer=Sorry: not going to get hearts racing. (1)}}
{{fwmdtt|nickname=Repo| image=Repo filled Mod.svg| tagline= Let’s go get sushi and not pay!| documentation= {{gmra}} and {{mra}}. Vague where it needs to be and not heavily negotiated.| docscore=3| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but would you, unless [[MiFID]] changed and you had to? No.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Generally cash.| collateralscore =0| transferability= | transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, so nope.| leveragescore =0| frightometer= Sorry: not going to get hearts racing. You can’t even short with them.| frightscore=1}}

Latest revision as of 09:01, 30 September 2024

Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®



Repo


“Let’s go get sushi and not pay!”


Docs Global Master Repurchase Agreement and Master Repurchase Agreement. Vague where it needs to be and not heavily negotiated. 3
Amendability Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but would you, unless MiFID changed and you had to? No. 2
Collateral Yes. Generally cash. 0
Transferability 0
Leverage Fully cash collateralised, so nope. 0
Fright-o-meter Sorry: not going to get hearts racing. You can’t even short with them. 1

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Repo_-_FWMD&oldid=91278"