Clunge v Rentier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|jclr|{{image|Internet Age|png|''The Golden Age of Internet'' {{vsr|1878}}}}}}<center>In the Contrarian’s Bench Division <br><br> | {{a|jclr|{{image|Internet Age|png|''The Golden Age of Internet'' {{vsr|1878}}}}}}<center>In the Contrarian’s Bench Division <br><br> | ||
<big>{{citet|Clunge|Rentier|2022|JCLR|60}}</big></center> <br><br> | <big>{{citet|Clunge|Rentier|2022|JCLR|60}}</big></center><br><br> | ||
2022 | October 31 2022 | ||
{{right|{{Cocklecarrot}}}} | |||
:''Tort — Disclaimer — Financial Advice — Whether Disclaimer Disclaiming Personal Responsibility and Recommending Independent Advice applied to Itself'' | |||
{{smallcaps|Motion to strike out}} proceedings brought by [[Sir Anthony Clunge, K.C.]], plaintiff, seeking damages in [[tort]] for [[negligent misstatement]] against Brandon “Chip” Rentier, defendant, relating to statements made on Social Media. | |||
{{smallcaps|Motion to strike out}} proceedings brought by [[Sir Anthony Clunge, K.C.]], plaintiff seeking damages in [[tort]] for [[negligent misstatement]] against Brandon “Chip” Rentier, defendant, relating to statements made on Social Media. | |||
Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant <br> | Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant <br> | ||
{{jerrold}}, for the respondent <br> | {{jerrold}}, for the respondent <br> | ||
{{right|(''Cur adv. vult)''}} | {{right|(''Cur adv. vult)''}} |