Adjectivisation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


from where it is a short leap to:  
from where it is a short leap to:  
{{quote|“Subject to what Chip thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}
{{quote|“Subject to what [[Chip]] thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal as presented in its current form for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[nominalisation]]
*[[nominalisation]]

Revision as of 18:17, 3 February 2022

Towards more picturesque speech

This sentence is indicative of adjectivisation.
This one indicates elegant prose.

SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The lexo-crime of taking a perfectly good verb, having it identify as an adjective and then demeaning it by sticking an inferior, dull, verb — like be, make, do, give, or worst of all effect — in front of it. Dead giveaways constructions include the passive and the word “of”.

“I support this proposal”

becomes

“I am supportive of this proposal”

from where it is a short leap to:

“Subject to what Chip thinks, I would be inclined to be supportive of the proposal as presented in its current form for the time being.”

See also