Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 1.44: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "If you have forgotten what it is like to have a tension headache, and for some reason feel like being reminded, the sterling work of {{icds}} on Section {{eqderivprov|1.44}} m..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you have forgotten what it is like to have a tension headache, and for some reason feel like being reminded, the sterling work of {{icds}} on Section {{eqderivprov|1.44}} might just be the aneurysm you are looking for. | [[Knock-in Event - Equity Derivatives Provision|If]] you have forgotten what it is like to have a tension headache, and for some reason feel like being reminded, the sterling work of {{icds}} on Section {{eqderivprov|1.44}} might just be the aneurysm you are looking for. | ||
It is basically simple but good GOD they make a meal of it. If you stipulate a {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Price}} ''below'' your strike price, if the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}} falls far enough to hit that price, or go below it, you have a {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Event}}. If your {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Price}} is above your initial strike, then the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}} has to go ''up'' to hit it. Whether you have hit it is measured at specified certain times on certain dates. | It is basically simple but good GOD they make a meal of it. If you stipulate a {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Price}} ''below'' your strike price, if the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}} falls far enough to hit that price, or go below it, you have a {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Event}}. If your {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Price}} is above your initial strike, then the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}} has to go ''up'' to hit it. Whether you have hit it is measured at specified certain times on certain dates. | ||
Can we envisage a circumstance in which the {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Reference Security}} is not the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}}? Well, I can’t but I am sure someone at [[Goldman]] could think of one. | Can we envisage a circumstance in which the {{eqderivprov|Knock-In Reference Security}} is not the {{eqderivprov|Underlier}}? Well, I can’t but I am sure someone at [[Goldman]] could think of one. | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 9 May 2022
If you have forgotten what it is like to have a tension headache, and for some reason feel like being reminded, the sterling work of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ on Section 1.44 might just be the aneurysm you are looking for.
It is basically simple but good GOD they make a meal of it. If you stipulate a Knock-In Price below your strike price, if the Underlier falls far enough to hit that price, or go below it, you have a Knock-In Event. If your Knock-In Price is above your initial strike, then the Underlier has to go up to hit it. Whether you have hit it is measured at specified certain times on certain dates.
Can we envisage a circumstance in which the Knock-In Reference Security is not the Underlier? Well, I can’t but I am sure someone at Goldman could think of one.