Past results are no guarantee of future performance: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not so much [[celery]] as meatloaf. Objects in the rear-view mirror may appear closer than they are. | Not so much [[celery]] as meatloaf. Objects in the rear-view mirror may appear closer than they are. | ||
A statement that ought to be so blindingly obvious at any point in time (other than the [[apocalypse]]) that you would really like to think [[lawyer]]s would not expect the [[Chicken licken|sky to fall in on your head]] if you don't say it. | |||
And there’s the irony: if the sky ''does'' fall in on your head, because you didn’t say it, then [[Q.E.D.]], the [[rapture]] ''has'' arrived, and past results ''would be'' a guarantee of future performance (since all data would exist, and could be extrapolated) but for the fact there ''is'' no future. | |||
Oh, lord, this is another one of those {{t|paradox}}es isn’t it. | |||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} |