Change in Tax Law - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdaanat|Change in Tax Law}} | {{isdaanat|Change in Tax Law}} | ||
So one mild observation here is that this definition does not specifically | So one mild observation here is that this definition of a “{{isdaprov|Change in Tax Law}}” does not specifically mention, you know, ''[[tax]]'' [[per se]]. Which at first glance is odd. | ||
This transpires not to matter, though, seeing as {{isdaprov|Change in Tax Law}} appears only twice in the {{2002ma}}, and in each case the context in which it appears is very specific to tax. They are: | |||
*Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}}(4)(B) (which deals with exclusions to the general requirement to [[gross up]] for {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}es; and | *Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}}(4)(B) (which deals with exclusions to the general requirement to [[gross up]] for {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}es; and | ||
*Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(iii)}} ({{isdaprov|Tax Event}}s), defining things that count as {{isdaprov|Tax Event}}s by making an {{isdaprov|Affected Party}} more likely to suffer an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}. | *Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(iii)}} ({{isdaprov|Tax Event}}s), defining things that count as {{isdaprov|Tax Event}}s by making an {{isdaprov|Affected Party}} more likely to suffer an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}. | ||
The provisions surrounding gross up and termination and Indemnifiable Taxes are some of the most (linguistically) complicated in the {{isdama}}, by the way. | The provisions surrounding gross up and termination and Indemnifiable Taxes are some of the most (linguistically) complicated in the {{isdama}}, by the way. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Tax Event}} |
Revision as of 12:18, 13 June 2019
ISDA Anatomy™
|
So one mild observation here is that this definition of a “Change in Tax Law” does not specifically mention, you know, tax per se. Which at first glance is odd.
This transpires not to matter, though, seeing as Change in Tax Law appears only twice in the 2002 ISDA, and in each case the context in which it appears is very specific to tax. They are:
- Section 2(d)(4)(B) (which deals with exclusions to the general requirement to gross up for Indemnifiable Taxes; and
- Section 5(b)(iii) (Tax Events), defining things that count as Tax Events by making an Affected Party more likely to suffer an Indemnifiable Tax.
The provisions surrounding gross up and termination and Indemnifiable Taxes are some of the most (linguistically) complicated in the ISDA Master Agreement, by the way.