Terry’s law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|maxim|}}A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} {{t|maxim}}. | {{a|maxim| | ||
[[File:Terry.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A chef getting away with what the eye don’t see, yesterday.]] | |||
}}A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} {{t|maxim}}. | |||
:''[[quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]'' | :''[[quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]'' |
Revision as of 12:54, 4 January 2021
|
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim.
Covenants, representations or warranties in two flavours:
- Those by which you expect counterparties to promptly advise you of their breach of contract to you
- Those the breach of which you cannot realistically expect to ever find out about, unless the counterparty owns up to them.
There is a dark inversion of this in the performance appraisal: What the Man don’t see, you don’t get no credit for. Hence, SMART goals, that bane of modern existence.
See also
- Immediately, versus as soon as reasonably practicable
- Quod non potes videre, non mihi reprehendo
- Representations and warranties
- Goal
Plain English Anatomy™ Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings