Template:Isda 5(b) comp

Renumbering due to new Force Majeure Event: Since the 2002 ISDA includes a {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}}, using language that was already agreed and widely inserted into the 1992 ISDA Schedule before its publication. Because this was entered as Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)(ii)}} — I mean, honestly, could they have not made it Section 5(b)(vi)? — this necessitates some numbering differences between the two versions of the ISDA Master Agreement — a drafting trick for young players to watch out for.
5(b)(i): Template:Isda 5(b)(i) comp
5(b)(ii): {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}}: There is no Force Majeure in the 1992 ISDA, though parties would habitually negotiate one in, and by the time the 2002 ISDA was published it was in fairly standardised. For those who didn’t negotiate it in there was also the ISDA Illegality/Force Majeure Protocol (see here) which they could sign — upon payment of the suitable fee is ISDA — to adopt/incorporate the relevant parts.
5(b)(iii): {{{{{1}}}|Tax Event}}: Other than the renumbering, no real change in the definition of {{{{{1}}}|Tax Event}} from the 1992 ISDA. Note, unhelpfully, the sub-paragraph reference in the 1992 ISDA is (1) and (2) and in the 2002 ISDA is (A) and (B). Otherwise, pretty much the same.
5(b)(iv): {{{{{1}}}|Tax Event Upon Merger}}: Note the missing “indemnifiable” from the fifth line of the 2002 ISDA version and the expanded description of “merger events” towards the end of the clause. And the renumbering as a result of the Force Majeure Event clause in the 2002 ISDA.
5(b)(v): First established in the 1987 ISDA, {{{{{1}}}|CEUM}} was gently upgraded for the 1992 ISDA to include {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entities}}, and to clarify who, upon such a merger, is the {{{{{1}}}|Affected Party}}, as per this comparison.

It then had quite the overhaul of {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}} between 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA as this comparison illustrates.

{{{{{1}}}|Designated Event}} is part of the definition of {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}} in the 2002 ISDA, and doesn’t have an equivalent in the 1992 ISDA nor, obviously enough,the 1987 ISDA.

The 2002 ISDA introduced the “Designated Event” in an attempt to define more forensically the sorts of corporate events that should be covered by CEUM. They are notoriously difficult to pin down. Even before the 2002 ISDA was published, it was common to upgrade the 1992 ISDA formulation to something resembling the glorious concoction that became Section 5(b)(v) of the 2002 ISDA. The 1992 wording is a bit lame. On the other hand, you could count the number of times an ISDA Master Agreement is closed out purely on account of Credit Event Upon Merger on the fingers of one hand, even if you had lost all the fingers on that hand to an industrial accident.

So — yeah.