Singulars and plurals

A roadside cafe, sometime in the 1980s. Bad News guitarist Den approaches the counter with his tray.

SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click ᐅ to expand: Plain English Drafting Metaphor

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Cashier: Two pounds and five pence, please, love.

Den: Two quid?

Cashier: That’s right, love. Two pounds and five pence.

Den: Two quid for one bloody sausage!

Cashier: It was clearly marked, love. “Sausage, beans and chips, two pounds and five pence.”

(Later)

Den: Wait a minute! It says “sausages” up there, not just one sausage! Look at that! Look, it says “sausages”! Where’s me other sausage, then?

—Comic Strip Presents: The Bad News Tour

To what end the forensic remark “All references to the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa”?

To your correspondent, none at all. This is throat-clearing, pointless text which, once in, benefits from the loving embrace of the anal paradox, but serves no purpose beyond the attorney’s noble pursuit of prolixity. No lawyer will ever object to it, but — and because — it plays no role in unravelling the practical meaning of the legal contract, bar the obvious ones, where a singular does not include the plural, and this language would be a total nonsense.

Can you imagine standing up in court and learnedly submitting that a plural did not include the singular? Good news: just such an exchange features in the pages of the Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports! Let us turn to our go-to thought experiment: a testy exchange between Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. and Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R., knee-deep, as they usually are, in bitter litigation.

Act II, Scene iv

A courtroom in the King’s Bench Division. Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. stares morosely at his brogues, silently cursing the wasted shoe-polish in those nasty little holes. Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. rises briskly, causing his chair to scrape flatulently on the parquet floor. Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. raises an eyebrow, and Sir Jerrold smiles thinly.

Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C.: M’Lud, the defendant acknowledges that it was obliged to comply with the plaintiff’s procedures — it says exactly that in clause 93.5(c)(iii)(G) of the indenture, it cannot be denied — but the vital point is this: the plaintiff only had one procedure. Its operations manager, Mr Strumpet, conceded as much in cross examination this morning. So my respectful submission, M'Lud, is that nowhere in this contract — nowhere — does it require the defendant to comply with a single procedure. And for this authority I respectfully submit —” here Sir Jerrold looks about wildly at his junior, Master Contrario, who looks back at him blankly. “— ah, as authority for this well established principle of English, ah, law —” here Sir Jerrold discreetly but violently jams his heel into his junior’s shin.

Master Contrario: AAAARGH! (collapses in agony in a dead-faint on the courtroom floor.)

Sir Jerrold (ostensibly horrified by the scene before him): Well, M’Lud this is most unusual! My learned friend is in some awful difficulty and I would pray brief adjournment while —

Cocklecarrot L.J.: While the ground swallows you up, Sir Jerrold?

Sir Jerrold: If it pleases M’Lud.

The Court adjourns. Sir Jerrold wipes his brow with a kerchief, and paramedics take Master Contrario away.