Security (2(b)) - IM CSD Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
(Redirected from 2(b) - IM CSD Provision)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2018 ISDA Credit Support Deed (IM) (English law)
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

Paragraph 2(b) in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!
2(b) Security. Each party as the Chargor, as security for it Obligations with full title guarantee:
(i) grants a first fixed charge to the Secured Party over:
(A) all Posted Credit Support (IM); and
(B) each Segregated Account, and
(ii) assigns absolutely the Assigned Rights to the Secured Party.

Full text of Paragraph 2(b)

2(b) Security. Each party as the Chargor, as security for the performance of the Obligations:
(i) charges and agrees to charge, with full title guarantee, in favour of the Secured Party by way of first fixed charge:
(A) all Posted Credit Support (IM) (present and future); and
(B) each Segregated Account, and
(ii) assigns and agrees to assign, with full title guarantee, the Assigned Rights to the Secured Party absolutely.

Related agreements and comparisons

Related Agreements
Click here for the text of Section NA in the 2016 ISDA VM CSA
Comparisons
Template:Csddiff 2(b)

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Content and comparisons

Template:M comp disc 2018 CSD 2(b)

Template

Summary

Some observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ are off their historical highs. We may find ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ to be haughty, fastidious and pedantic — not, traditionally, seen as shortcomings even if they make the day-to-day experience in the trenches that much more like the Somme — but, generally, the Squad’s legal acumen as been beyond reproach: standing waist-deep in mud for months on end is good for a young negotiator, as long as it is in the service of justified probity.

But in the 2018 English law IM CSD, we see the standard slipping. This clause is a good example:

(present or future)”: Tossed out, no doubt, as a universal redundant catch-all, it doesn’t quite work in a security charging clause. You can’t, actually, grant a fixed charge over something you haven’t yet delivered into the account you are charging, you can’t identify, and which you aren’t yet — by the very theory of the game — even obliged to deliver into that account. There’s an ontological problem here. It goes deep. For how are you supposed to identify with any certainty what your future Posted Credit Support (IM) will be, before it has been calculated, before it is due, before you’ve posted it, at all, let alone with enough certainty for a fixed charge to attach to it, we can only wonder.

And is the assignment of these rights really absolute, or by way of security?

Template

See also

Template:M sa 2018 CSD 2(b)

Template

References