Early Termination - ISDA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 17:41, 11 April 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ISDA Anatomy™
incorporating our exclusive ISDA in a Nutshell™


6 Early Termination
6(a) Right to Terminate following Event of Default
6(b) Right to Terminate following Termination Event
6(b)(i) Notice (of Termination Event)
6(b)(ii) Transfer to Avoid Termination Event
6(b)(iii) Two Affected Parties
6(b)(iv) Right to Terminate
6(c) Effect of Designation
6(d) Calculations
6(e) Payments on Early Termination
6(e)(i) Events of Default (Early Termination Payments)
6(e)(ii) Termination Events (Early Termination Payments)
6(e)(iii) Adjustment for Bankruptcy (Early Termination Payments)
6(e)(iv) Adjustment for Illegality or Force Majeure Event
6(e)(v) Pre-Estimate (Early Termination Payments)
6(f) Set Off


Index: Click to expand:Navigation
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

Early Termination 6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

No general termination right under the ISDA Master Agreement
Unlike the 2010 GMSLA and many other — ahh, less sophisticated master agreements[1] — the ISDA Master Agreement doesn’t have a general termination right of this sort at all. It is like one of those fancy fixie pushbikes that cost seven grand and don’t even have brakes. You can only terminate Transactions, not the master agreement construct which sits around them. The empty vessel of a closed-out ISDA thus remains for all eternity as an immortal, ineffectual husk. This is to do with paranoid fears about the efficacy of the ISDA’s sainted close-out netting terms if you do terminate the agreement — meh; maybe — but I like to think it is because, before he was cast out from heaven, the Dark Lord[2] made plans to unleash his retributive fury upon the world through a sleeping army of wight-walker zombie ISDAs, doomed to roam the earth until the day of judgment, apropos nothing but there, not alive, but un-dead, ready to reanimate and rally to the Dark Lord’s banner and rain apocalyptic hell on we errant descendants of the Good Man, who did not heed His warnings of financial weapons of mass destruction.

How the Close-out mechanism Works

An Event of Default gives the Non-defaulting Party a right (but not an obligation) to designate an Early Termination Date with respect to all outstanding Transactions on not more than 20 days' notice.

  • Note that Automatic Early Termination removes that optionality in the event of a counterparty's insolvency and is, therefore, sub-optimal from the Non-defaulting Party's perspective, and thus should only be employed where the consequences of not having it would be worse (e.g. in jurisdictions where close-out netting may be challenged in an insolvency but not before). (That is to say, this is one provision you should not insist on just because the other party insists upon it against you).
  • For what this optionality not to terminate means, and how controversial it can be, see the commentary to Section 2(a)(iii).

Once all Transactions are terminated, you move to Section 6(e) which directs how to value the transactions (it depends on who is the Defaulting Party, and whether you have elected Loss or Market Quotation, and First Method or Second Method. Under the 2002 ISDA it is much easier.

References

  1. Yes; there is some inter-industry association bitterness and snobbery here.
  2. Sauron, Beelzebub, Nosferatu, Lehman Brothers etc.