Fox pass: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|negotiation|
{{a|negotiation|
[[File:Fox.jpg|thumb|A passing fox, yesterday]]
[[File:Fox.jpg|thumb|center|A passing fox, yesterday]]
}}As with any arcane and specialist subject, the {{isda}} documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and [[faux pas]] for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an [[eye-ess-dee-aye]] (it's [[izder]]), or a transaction under it as a [[Sw-æp]] (it's [[Sw-ŏp]]).
}}As with any arcane and specialist subject, the {{isda}} documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and [[faux pas]] for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an [[eye-ess-dee-aye]] (it's [[izder]]), or a transaction under it as a [[Sw-æp]] (it's [[Sw-ŏp]]).



Revision as of 13:04, 18 July 2019

Negotiation Anatomy™

A passing fox, yesterday


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

As with any arcane and specialist subject, the ISDA documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and faux pas for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an eye-ess-dee-aye (it's izder), or a transaction under it as a Sw-æp (it's Sw-ŏp).

The 2010 GMSLA is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. jimzler, gummizler, gee-em-ess-el-aye: all are fine, but may peg you as a regional specialist (or quaintly old-fashioned) at worst.

See also