Risk versus vulnerability

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 16:03, 31 July 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Accidents will happen. Four strategies for coping: three focus on the accident, one focuses on your organisation.

Accidents

  • Dealing with accidents:
  • Respond to accidents when they happen
  • Limit damage accidents can cause
  • Minimise chance that accidents happen
Reaction Damage Limitation Avoidance/Prevention

Closeout
Event of default
Breach of contract

Trade monitoring
Monitor for red flags
Regular due diligence

Have good data and know your client
Relationship management
Credit lines

Chaos
Fog of war
Panic
Urgency
Volatility
Fear
Lack of information: if you are at reaction point, chances are your information was already bad and will now be worse.
Compounding effect of above effects in combination.

Holistic views: where are the exposures concentrated? Where is market risk concentrated?Where are are margin multipliers thinnest? Are there any concentrations of red flags? Share data across credit, fnancial crime compliance, trading

Calm
Orderly
Timely
Systematic
Thorough
Inquisitive: the object is not to satisfy yourself that there is no risk but to to identify where is the risk

Vulnerability

  • Concentration of energy — in a financial services firm, call this financial risk, or profit-and-loss generators

A:*Concentration of population — different modelsof distributed network. Compare “hub and spoke” models like airports (fragile — take out a hub and large parts of the system are inoperable) with “multiple-node” networks like the internet (robust — take out a node and everything can flow a different way).

  • Concentration of political/economic power— increases the vulnerability to harm from executive failure.