Tangible: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{g}}Spotted in the wild: :''"Confidential Information" means all and any information disclosed by either Party...")
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}Spotted in the wild:  
{{g}}Spotted in the wild:  
:''"[[Confidential Information - Confi Provision|Confidential Information]]" means [[Any and all|all and any]] information disclosed by either Party to the other Party, [[whether]] in writing or other [[tangible]] form, in any way relating or pertaining to the disclosing party...''
:“'''''[[Confidential Information - Confi Provision|Confidential Information]]''' means [[Any and all|all and any]] information disclosed by either Party to the other Party, [[whether]] in writing or other [[tangible]] form, in any way relating or pertaining to the disclosing party...''


“[[Tangible]]”, so the internets tell us, is “perceptible by touch”. Now the [[substrate]] in which writing was traditionally embedded, paper, is assuredly tangible. Unless your writing is braille, or so expensively embossed that one can detect letters when one brushes ones fingers over the onionskin, writing is not tangible. Certainly not when, as most writing in these moderns times is, not embedded in a physical substrate, but represented by the orientation of a liquid crystal between two perpendicular polarising elements<ref>Thanks, internet.</ref> on an LED display. Writing is not tangible at all. Information isn't tangible. It is an abstract concatenation of binary values.
“[[Tangible]]”, so the internets tell us, means “perceptible by touch”. Now the ''[[substrate]]'' in which writing was traditionally embedded paper is assuredly [[tangible]]. But, unless your writing is braille, or so expensively embossed that one can detect the letters when one brushes one’s fingers over the onionskin, ''writing'' is not [[tangible]]. Certainly not when, as is common in these dark modern times, writing is not embedded in a physical [[substrate]] at all, but represented by the orientation of millions of liquid crystals between perpendicular polarising elements on an LED display.<ref>Thanks, internet.</ref> Writing is information. Information is an abstract concatenation of binary values. It has no physical dimension. You can’t touch it. Indeed the digital revolution through which we are living, loving and relentlessly bullshitting on [[LinkedIn]] dates back to the moment, in the early 19th Century, when Monsieur [[Jacquard loom|Jacquard]] figured out how to perform that exact abstraction.


So hard lines on your confi, that is to say if you have restricted it to “[[tangible]]” forms of information.
So, hard lines if, when hammering-out that confi you sagely restricted it to “[[tangible]]” forms of information.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Substrate]]
*[[Substrate]]
*[[Jacquard loom]]
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 10:07, 26 May 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Spotted in the wild:

Confidential Information means all and any information disclosed by either Party to the other Party, whether in writing or other tangible form, in any way relating or pertaining to the disclosing party...

Tangible”, so the internets tell us, means “perceptible by touch”. Now the substrate in which writing was traditionally embedded — paper — is assuredly tangible. But, unless your writing is braille, or so expensively embossed that one can detect the letters when one brushes one’s fingers over the onionskin, writing is not tangible. Certainly not when, as is common in these dark modern times, writing is not embedded in a physical substrate at all, but represented by the orientation of millions of liquid crystals between perpendicular polarising elements on an LED display.[1] Writing is information. Information is an abstract concatenation of binary values. It has no physical dimension. You can’t touch it. Indeed the digital revolution through which we are living, loving and relentlessly bullshitting on LinkedIn dates back to the moment, in the early 19th Century, when Monsieur Jacquard figured out how to perform that exact abstraction.

So, hard lines if, when hammering-out that confi you sagely restricted it to “tangible” forms of information.

See also

References

  1. Thanks, internet.