81,635
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=====An {{tag|indemnity}} is ''not'' (necessarily) of indeterminate scope===== | =====An {{tag|indemnity}} is ''not'' (necessarily) of indeterminate scope===== | ||
Nor is a (well-crafted) {{tag|indemnity}} broader or of | Nor is a (well-crafted) {{tag|indemnity}} broader or of lesso i have a blogs determinate scope than any other contractual claim. A good one should have a predictable and reasonable financial consequence: It might be to reimburse taxes or similar unavoidable expenses a merchant incurs in performing the contract, that it would not, but for that contract. The [[Chicken Licken|sky should not fall in]] under the weight of a well-proportioned {{tag|indemnity}}. | ||
It is a precision tool to allocate responsibility for a narrow risk, not a weapon of mass destruction. | It is a precision tool to allocate responsibility for a narrow risk, not a [[Weapons of financial mass destruction|weapon of mass destruction]]. | ||
===You keep saying “[[well-crafted indemnity|''well-crafted'' indemnity]]”=== | ===You keep saying “[[well-crafted indemnity|''well-crafted'' indemnity]]”=== |