Third party

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 19:32, 3 December 2022 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|cosmology|}} if we take it it as granted, per the experimental lexa physics of pioneers such as J.F.M. Biggs that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately de...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Financial cosmology
The JC’s guide to theoretical physics in the markets.™


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

if we take it it as granted, per the experimental lexa physics of pioneers such as J.F.M. Biggs that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the space-tedium continuum, with its in-folded inclusos, provisos, provisos, then we have to consider whether the usual tripartite dimensional structure is appropriate.

A naive view of commerce would say there is the contractual counterparties (“Party A” and “Party B” or, for old fashioned finance types, “Bank” and “Borrower”) and the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.