Tort: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.


But don't be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you're playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].
But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you're playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].


C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 19:18, 23 February 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.

You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.

But don’t be a nuisance.[1] Unless you're playing cricket.

C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.

References

  1. This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.