Tort: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.


But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you're playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].
But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you’re playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].


C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 15:44, 17 June 2021

The basic principles of tort
A Jolly Contrarian guide to loving thy neighbour™


Contract quasi-contractquasi-agencytortrestitution Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.

You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.

But don’t be a nuisance.[1] Unless you’re playing cricket.

C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.

References

  1. This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.