83,371
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Clause {{gmraprov|9(e)}} is a nice, wide, broadly crafted representation that captures all manner of hermeneutic transgressions of intersectional space but, every now and then...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Clause {{gmraprov|9(e)}} is a nice, wide, broadly crafted representation that captures all manner of hermeneutic transgressions of intersectional space but, every now and then, still won’t quite ''do'' for some [[legal eagle]] or other. Perhaps, they quail, it might not capture a mendacious circumvention of risk retention rules under the EU Securitisation Directive or something like that.<ref>Yes, that does have a ring of verisimilitude about it, doesn’t it. You will never guess why.</ref> They will ask for flannel, over and above, to give them | Clause {{gmraprov|9(e)}} is a nice, wide, broadly crafted [[representation]] that captures all manner of hermeneutic transgressions of intersectional space but, every now and then, still won’t quite ''do'' for some [[legal eagle]] or other. Perhaps, they quail, it might not capture a mendacious circumvention of, ohh, I don’t know, risk retention rules under the EU Securitisation Directive or something like that.<ref>Yes, that does have a ring of verisimilitude about it, doesn’t it. You will never guess why.</ref> They will ask for flannel, over and above, to give them comfort, and may (probably will, actually) blame their counsel for making them insist on this. | ||
Be firm. | Be firm. |