EBayer’s dilemma
Risk Anatomy™
|
For those spooked by the idea of the prisoner’s dilemma — being locked up in a police cell on trumped-up charges, consider instead the eBayer’s dilemma. This version Douglas Hofstadter once described as the "briefcase came", but Millennials will recognise it as the eBayer’s dilemma.
Strangers consider a settling a transaction they have drunkenly agreed on eBay to purchase a set of complete boxed set of the final season of Some Mothers Do ’Ave ’Em on VHS, for £100[1].
The seller must pay for, and the buyer must post the videos, simultaneously. Assume the seller would have sold the videos at any price over £50 (so the transaction represents a £50 profit for her), and the buyer would have paid up to £150 had that been the asking price (the transaction therefore representing a £50 profit for him). In other words, by honouring the transaction, each stands to gain £50.
eBayer’s dilemma |
Buyer cooperates |
Buyer defects |
Seller cooperates |
Buyer gets £50 |
Buyer gets £150 |
Seller defects |
Buyer gets -£100 |
Buyer gets £0 |
When settling the transaction, each has the following risks:
- Cooperation: If the seller posts and the buyer pays:
- The seller will get £100 but will lose a video it values a £50 (+£50).
- the seller will get a video it values at £150 but must pay £100 (+50)
- buyer defects: If the seller posts, but the buyer does not pay:
- The buyer will have video it values at £150 for free (+£150)
- The seller has given away a video it values a £50 for nothing (-£50).
- Seller defects: If the buyer pays but the seller does not post:
- The buyer will have paid £100 for nothing (-£100)
- The seller will receive £100 for nothing (+£100).
- Mutual defection If the seller does not post and the buyer does not pay:
- The seller is in its original position (£0).
- The buyer is in its original position (£0).
See also
References
- ↑ The eBayers don’t have to be drunk, but as we all know, most people on eBay are, so this is a bit of dramatic colour.