113
edits
Enron v TXU: Difference between revisions
→Subsequent Contrary Rulings
(Created page with "''Enron, Australia vs. TXU Electricity Ltd'' [2003] NSWSC 1169 is an Australian case focusing on the {{isdaprov|General Conditions}} clause of the {{isdama}}. ===Facts=== The...") |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Subsequent Contrary Rulings=== | ===Subsequent Contrary Rulings=== | ||
Different conclusions (albeit in different jurisdictions) have been subsequently arrived at in the US ({{casenote|Metavante|Lehman | Different conclusions (albeit in different jurisdictions) have been subsequently arrived at in the US ({{casenote|Metavante|Lehman}}) and UK ({{casenote|Marine Trade|Pioneer}}). | ||
{{2(a)(iii)}} | {{2(a)(iii)}} | ||