Kosmar Villa Holidays plc v Trustees of Syndicate 1243

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports from the Contrarian’s Bench Division. →Go uptown Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort |Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Case notes Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Kosmar Villa Holidays plc v Trustees of Syndicate 1243 [2008] Bus LR 931 is the leading modern case on contractual waiver, canvasses the history and discusses the differences, and sumilarities, between estoppel by waiver and waiver by election. Lord Justice Rix:

“Estoppel, however, is a promise, supported not by consideration but by reliance. It is a promise not to rely upon a defence (per Lord Diplock) or a right (per Lord Goff). It requires a representation, in words or conduct, which must be unequivocal and must have been relied upon in circumstances where it would be inequitable for the promise to be withdrawn. The need for such unfairness probably means that the reliance of the representee has to constitute a detriment, but even the detriment has, I would think, to be such as to make it inequitable for the promise to be withdrawn. For these reasons, the estoppel may not be irrevocable, but may be suspensory only. An unequivocal representation without the necessary reliance, and reliance without the necessary unequivocal representation, are each insufficient.”

See also

• Waiver by estoppel
• Waiver by election