Search results

  • ...e. Consider there are, literally, ''billions'' of users of word processing software but, to all intents, ''two'' viable word-processing applications in the wor ===On “niche” versus “enterprise” and the [[meatware]]/software bet===
    8 KB (1,401 words) - 14:16, 16 January 2023
  • ...ary metadata on top of it<ref>With the [[tedious]] overheads that implies: software licence fees and a squadron of librarians chasing users up to validate the
    3 KB (412 words) - 09:30, 31 August 2021
  • ...rce the way scientists experiment on mice. It is designed to make sure new software it would like to impose on the workforce but which users do not want, under
    2 KB (401 words) - 08:53, 23 June 2020
  • Approval subroutines have fired and launched escalations for the spend on the software vendor; a militarised [[3-PISA|third party information security]] analytics
    3 KB (416 words) - 14:10, 13 April 2023
  • It isn’t just about buying software.
    3 KB (447 words) - 11:34, 17 October 2017
  • ...low from the simple fact of size (e.g., adding another user to an existing software licence automatically ''reduces'' the per-user cost of the licence, without
    3 KB (491 words) - 10:12, 16 April 2022
  • {{caps|'''[[JC]]'''}}: Great! How about some decent document comparison software?<br>
    3 KB (440 words) - 07:46, 16 September 2023
  • ...e of poor or substandard operators, but because of ''manifestly inadequate software''.
    3 KB (546 words) - 13:09, 16 May 2022
  • ...] that [[legal eagles]] never had trouble adopting was document comparison software. Over the years this kit has gone by different names: Americans call it “
    2 KB (384 words) - 18:19, 23 September 2023
  • ...of software management. In any decent-sized organisation, pitches for new software will come in from all sides, and carefully curating the the IT “estate” ...sappoints even at that. To augment or change the application to which your software is dedicated, to meet a new challenge or opportunity — that requires ''ju
    13 KB (2,070 words) - 10:16, 16 June 2022
  • *[[Software as a service]]
    4 KB (549 words) - 18:07, 8 December 2022
  • *[[Software as a service]]
    4 KB (580 words) - 18:09, 2 May 2024
  • *Open source solutions - There is a lot of good, free software available (e.g. Mediawiki)
    4 KB (644 words) - 14:41, 28 February 2018
  • ...r bonds at all — the Wikipedia example. Different types of emergent social software platforms (ESSPs) work better for different types of community bond. McAfee
    5 KB (756 words) - 19:18, 9 January 2021
  • ...such contract in wide use). Hence: “Hi I would like to pitch you my new [[software as a service]] offering, which can intelligently automate your entire legal
    4 KB (629 words) - 19:43, 21 November 2023
  • ...rk'']] threw together over a mad weekend six months ago. You know how your software contraption was quite easy, in the scheme of things, to make? How it only c
    5 KB (755 words) - 12:38, 7 May 2024
  • ...advice for those who write [[playbook]]s. It’s all very well having clever software that can read your [[confidentiality agreement]]s and mark them up accordin
    6 KB (932 words) - 17:08, 12 December 2022
  • ...— is piling up. Granted, a lot of it is ''crap'' work: [[internal audit]], software [[change manager|change management]], six-sigma process analysis and [[tale
    6 KB (952 words) - 11:21, 6 January 2022
  • *[[Software-as-a-service]]
    5 KB (849 words) - 15:29, 21 February 2024
  • ...thor|Daniel Dennett}} (''[https://philpapers.org/rec/DENJJS Julian Jaynes’ Software Archaeology]'') but its critique was of emphasis rather than substance and
    6 KB (1,033 words) - 10:04, 18 August 2022
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)