113
edits
Template:2(a)(iii): Difference between revisions
→Section 2(a)(iii) litigation
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Section 2(a)(iii) litigation== | ==Section 2(a)(iii) litigation== | ||
This is one of the handful of important authorities on the effect of the suspension of obligations under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} of the {{isdama}}, and whether [[flawed asset]] provision amounts to an [[ipso facto clause]] under the [[US Bankruptcy Code]] or a violation of the [[anti-deprivation | This is one of the handful of important authorities on the effect of the suspension of obligations under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} of the {{isdama}}, and whether [[flawed asset]] provision amounts to an [[ipso facto clause]] under the [[US Bankruptcy Code]] or a violation of the [[anti-deprivation]] principle under English law. | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
*{{casenote|Lomas|Firth Rixson}} | *{{casenote|Lomas|Firth Rixson}} | ||