Template:M intro systems financialisation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 1: Line 1:
Definitions - financialisation is reducing things to their most calculable amounts. So: David Graeber’s social debt versus monetary debt.
Definitions: let us call “financialisation” the goal of reducing things to their most calculable, and manipulable ''values''. So: David Graeber’s social debt versus monetary debt.
 
The most manipulable, [[fungible]], calculable, aggregatable articulation of [[value]] known to western society is [[cash]] — [[degenerate fiat]] cash, sorry crypto bros— and it is what we describe our relationships in. Hence “financialisation”, but it needs not involve money. Reviews, five point performance appraisals, RAG statuses, star ratings, measurable criteria — anything which can be ordered, pivoted, Pareto ratioed, and put into


Distils down to a worldview that analogue, informal, requiring judgment, requiring [[metis]] is expensive, slow and unscalable and therefore ''bad''.
Distils down to a worldview that analogue, informal, requiring judgment, requiring [[metis]] is expensive, slow and unscalable and therefore ''bad''.
Line 6: Line 8:
[[James C. Scott]]’s observation that a top-down organisation can only operate by what it sees, which necessarily misses nuance.
[[James C. Scott]]’s observation that a top-down organisation can only operate by what it sees, which necessarily misses nuance.


[[Robert Michel]]s’ [[iron law of oligopoly]], that at scale all organisations concentrate “power” and become top-down
[[Robert Michel]]s’ [[iron law of oligopoly]], that at all organisations concentrate “power” and become top-down


The madness of crowds and our interconnectedness: if it was hard to be exceptional before the internet, it is so much harder now. Yet we kid ourselves that we are all exceptional. If we are all competing at the same thing, we have almost no chance of excelling. These are the [[Bayesian priors]]. But everyone of us is different.
The madness of crowds and our interconnectedness: if it was hard to be exceptional before the internet, it is so much harder now. Yet we kid ourselves that we are all exceptional. If we are all competing at the same thing, we have almost no chance of excelling. These are the [[Bayesian priors]]. But everyone of us is different.