83,221
edits
Shubtill v Port Authority of Finchley: Difference between revisions
Shubtill v Port Authority of Finchley (view source)
Revision as of 09:21, 8 November 2016
, 8 November 2016no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The plaintiff had sought approval from the defendant, a local authority, for a punting business in the Hampstead Garden Suburb. The defendant claimed it declined in a conversation with the plaintiff, as it was entitled to do in accordance with the governing regulations. The regulation required notification of the consideration to be delivered [[orally or in writing]]. | The plaintiff [[Ernest Shubtill]] had sought approval from the defendant, a local authority, for a punting business in the Hampstead Garden Suburb. The defendant claimed it declined in a conversation with the plaintiff, as it was entitled to do in accordance with the governing regulations. The regulation required notification of the consideration to be delivered [[orally or in writing]]. | ||
{{box|Any person affected by a direction issued under this subchapter may request reconsideration by the official who issued it or in whose name it was issued. This request may be made [[orally or in writing]], and the decision of the official receiving the request may be rendered [[orally or in writing]]. | {{box|Any person affected by a direction issued under this subchapter may request reconsideration by the official who issued it or in whose name it was issued. This request may be made [[orally or in writing]], and the decision of the official receiving the request may be rendered [[orally or in writing]]. | ||