83,240
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{casenote|Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd|New Garage & Motor Co Ltd}} | {{casenote|Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd|New Garage & Motor Co Ltd}} (1915) AC 79, is a leading case on [[penalty clauses]] (bad) and [[liquidated damages]] clauses (good). | ||
Lord Dunedin had suggested the following often quoted factors: | Lord Dunedin had suggested the following often quoted factors: | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Glossed over more recently by {{casenote|ParkingEye Ltd|Beavis}} and {{casenote|Cavendish Square Holdings|El Makdessi}}, which seem better fit for the kinder, gentler world we now inhabit. | Glossed over more recently by {{casenote|ParkingEye Ltd|Beavis}} and {{casenote|Cavendish Square Holdings|El Makdessi}}, which seem better fit for the kinder, gentler world we now inhabit. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*[[Penalty clause]] | |||
*{{casenote|ParkingEye Ltd|Beavis}} | |||
*{{casenote|Cavendish Square Holdings|El Makdessi}} |