83,307
edits
ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Leading cases on penalty clauses and liquidated damages, handed down in tandem with {{casenote|Cavendish Square Holdings|El Makdessi}} [2015] UKSC 67, straying from an...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
ParkingEye said, “we'll see you in court, buster. | ParkingEye said, “we'll see you in court, buster. | ||
”My Beavis said, “you’re on. Let’s have a massive court fight which forges a new path in English law | ”My Beavis said, “you’re on. Let’s have a massive court fight .” | ||
And lo, it came to pass that a piffling dispute over less than a [[monkey]] led fully seven law lords (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Carnwath, Toulson and Hodge) to create a 124 page judgment which forges a new path in English contract law. | |||
A pair of veritable modern-day ''[[Fardell v Potts|Alberti Haddocki]]''. | A pair of veritable modern-day ''[[Fardell v Potts|Alberti Haddocki]]''. | ||