Goldman: Difference between revisions

Goldman (view source)

Revision as of 22:21, 18 January 2019

425 bytes added , 18 January 2019

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,976

edits

Revision as of 11:57, 18 January 2019 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:21, 18 January 2019 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Word has it a former senior partner sold his, and the firm’s [[Vampire\|undead soul]] to Beelzebub, ~~then masquerading as a~~ [[Sullivan and Cromwell]] ~~partner<ref>This is of course totally untrue~~. ~~We make this clear just~~ in ~~case~~ [[~~Sullivan and Cromwell~~]], [~~[and~~/~~or]~~] [[Goldman ~~Sachs~~]], ~~fail to see~~ the ~~funny side~~</ref>.		Word has it a former senior partner of this storied Wall Street [[broker]] sold his, and the firm’s [[Vampire\|undead soul]]{{important disclaimer}} to Beelzebub, not realising he was an equity partner at [[Sullivan and Cromwell]]{{important disclaimer}}. Well, how else do you go from discounting jewellers bills on a bicycle in Park Slope to being a "great [[vampire squid]] wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money."<ref>Whatever you think of the market, finance and bankers, you should read Matt Taibi's [https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-195229/ celebrated hit] on [[Goldman]], just for the virtuoso writing. </ref>

	Always “[[Goldman]]”, a singular noun for a singular firm. ''Never'' “[[Goldmans]]”.		Always “[[Goldman]]”, a singular noun for a singular firm. ''Never'' “[[Goldmans]]”.