Template:GMSLA compensation for mismanagement: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
On one hand, the definition of {{gmslaprov|Income}} is very wide:
On one hand, the definition of {{gmslaprov|Income}} is very wide:


''{{Template:GMSLA 2010 Income}}''
''{{Template:GMSLA 2010 Income}}''


On the other hand — and it pains me somewhat to lay some {{t|Latin}} on you, but I will — the [[ejusdem generis]] rule of interpretation says where general words (here, “distribution of [[Any type, kind or nature|any kind whatsoever]]”) follow specific words (“[[Dividend - Equity Derivatives Provision|dividends]], [[interest]]”), the general words are cover only objects similar in nature to those specific words. So the distribution should be of the same nature as interest or dividends.
On the other hand — and it pains me somewhat to lay some {{t|Latin}} on you, but I will — the [[ejusdem generis]] rule of interpretation says where general words (here, “distribution of [[Any type, kind or nature|any kind whatsoever]]”) follow specific words (“[[Dividend - Equity Derivatives Provision|dividends]], [[interest]]”), the general words are cover only objects similar in nature to those specific words. So the distribution should be of the same nature as interest or dividends.