83,357
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|negotiation|}}One of those good, well-tempered folk of the [[documentation unit]] whose task, though not Herculean in any aspect | {{a|negotiation|}}One of those good, well-tempered folk of the [[documentation unit]] whose task, though not Herculean in any aspect bar its [[tedium]], is stoutly resisting predictions that it will be [[automated]] by the end of the year — a prediction that [[legal technology|legal and technology]] luminaries have been making regularly since 1995. | ||
Do you want to know [[Waste|why]], by the way? | Do you want to know [[Waste|why]], by the way? | ||
Still, every character archetype has a weakness, and the [[Jolly Contrarian]] can reveal the | Still, every character archetype has a weakness, and the [[Jolly Contrarian]] can reveal the innate flaw of every [[ISDA negotiator]], and that is total cluelessness about paragraph formatting in [[Microsoft Word]]. They just ''cannot'' do it. Page breaks and multi-level automatic numbering are trying enough, but asking a negotiator to format a table of {{isdaprov|Documents for Delivery}} — and every manjack amongst them must do it — is a guaranteed disaster. | ||
The [[collective noun]] for a group of negotiators — especially those attached to the same deal — is a “[[squabble]]”. | The [[collective noun]] for a group of negotiators — especially those attached to the same deal — is a “[[squabble]]”. |