83,341
edits
The onus of proof is on the person making an existential claim: Difference between revisions
The onus of proof is on the person making an existential claim (view source)
Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
, 18 January 2020no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A principal of sound argument that posits that one need not prove a negative. Because it’s impossible to prove a negative. It’s hard enough to prove a positive (the best y...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A principal of sound argument that posits that one need not prove a negative. Because it’s impossible to prove a negative. It’s hard enough to prove a positive (the best you can do is point to an absence of contradictory evidence). | {{a|plainenglish|[[File:Nasty.jpg|thumb|450px|center|A freeze-frame that will drive you insane.]]}}A principal of sound argument that posits that one need not prove a negative. Because it’s impossible to prove a negative. It’s hard enough to prove a positive (the best you can do is point to an absence of contradictory evidence). | ||
The principle is evidenced as well as anywhere by Mike and | The principle is evidenced as well as anywhere by Mike and Vyvyan: | ||
{{video nasty}} | {{video nasty}} | ||
It flows into legal draftery, although you would not know it from the timidity with which many [[Mediocre lawyer|modern commercial lawyers]] festoon their contracts. ''You don’t need to say what you don’t have to do in a contract''. Not even [[for the avoidance of doubt]]. | It flows into legal draftery, although you would not know it from the timidity with which many [[Mediocre lawyer|modern commercial lawyers]] festoon their contracts. ''You don’t need to say what you don’t have to do in a contract''. Not even [[for the avoidance of doubt]]. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[I never said it was]] | *[[I never said it was]] | ||
{{ | {{Ref}} | ||