83,057
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{gmraanat|10|2000}} | {{gmraanat|10|2000}} | ||
===The dog that | ===The dog that didn’t bark in the nighttime=== | ||
Most interesting is what is '''not''' in there: There is no: | Most interesting is what is '''not''' in there: There is no: | ||
*{{gmraprov|Cross Default}} | *{{gmraprov|Cross Default}} | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
===A sensible approach?=== | ===A sensible approach?=== | ||
Some scholars—okay: one - and no it | Some scholars—okay: one - and no it isn’t the [[Jolly Contrarian]] although he does get the point—have intimated that the {{1995gmra}} got this right and the {{2000gmra}} got it wrong. For the following reasons: | ||
*'''Initiation''': A delivery failure by a {{gmraprov|Lender}} when initiating a repo has no consequence – it is neither an Event of Default, nor a breach of contract. Section {{gmraprov|10(g)}} allows the {{gmraprov|Buyer}} to terminate the repo at any time while the delivery failure is continuing ''or'' to work with the {{gmraprov|Seller}} to initiate the repo on a later date. | *'''Initiation''': A delivery failure by a {{gmraprov|Lender}} when initiating a repo has no consequence – it is neither an Event of Default, nor a breach of contract. Section {{gmraprov|10(g)}} allows the {{gmraprov|Buyer}} to terminate the repo at any time while the delivery failure is continuing ''or'' to work with the {{gmraprov|Seller}} to initiate the repo on a later date. | ||
*'''Scheduled maturity''': A redelivery failure by a {{gmraprov|Borrower}} at term is not an {{gmraprov|Event of Default}}. Rather, the {{gmraprov|Lender}} may [[buy in]] the securities using section {{gmraprov|10(h)}}. | *'''Scheduled maturity''': A redelivery failure by a {{gmraprov|Borrower}} at term is not an {{gmraprov|Event of Default}}. Rather, the {{gmraprov|Lender}} may [[buy in]] the securities using section {{gmraprov|10(h)}}. |