Electronic execution: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


For a properly-implemented digital execution strategy will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits out of all proportion to the simplicity of the technology. This, [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] feels, will have a far bigger impact on productivity than [[chatbot]]s, [[natural language processing]] or the forthcoming [[Singularity]]. It’s just not as ''sexy''.
For a properly-implemented digital execution strategy will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits out of all proportion to the simplicity of the technology. This, [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] feels, will have a far bigger impact on productivity than [[chatbot]]s, [[natural language processing]] or the forthcoming [[Singularity]]. It’s just not as ''sexy''.
But first, a self-indulgent foray into the [[jurisprudence]] of the contract itself.


{{contract vs document}}
{{contract vs document}}


===But does it work, legally?===
===So does electronic execution work, then?===
Cue voluminous, sombre, [[tedious]] monographs on the legal effectiveness in different jurisdictions of electronic signatures.<ref>The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/electronic-execution-of-documents/ UK Law Commission], as recently as March 2020, for example.</ref> These are mainly confined to the specific issues arising where a local jurisdiction prescribes some form to the way one enters into a special ''type'' of contract — one relating to the conveyance of real estate, for example, or a [[deed]].
Cue voluminous, sombre, [[tedious]] monographs on the legal effectiveness of electronic execution in different jurisdictions.<ref>The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/electronic-execution-of-documents/ UK Law Commission], as recently as March 2020, for example.</ref> These are mainly confined to the specific issues arising where a local jurisdiction prescribes some form to the way one enters into a special ''type'' of contract — one relating to the conveyance of real estate, for example, or a [[deed]].


So  — unless your [[Financial instrument|instrument]] is a [[deed]] or [[lease]] or has such peculiar formal execution requirements — and most [[confirmation]]s, instructions and even master trading agreements which pass between the operational teams of financial institutions won’t<ref>Exception: anything signed as a [[deed]]: a [[security financial collateral arrangement]], for example, or a [[guarantee]] or a master agreement building a security interest in, such as a [[prime brokerage agreement]]</ref>  — it needn’t be that complicated. Generally, digital signatures are fine and, in many respects, ''better'' than handwritten signatures, especially a scanned, emailed [[facsimile]] of a handwritten signature which could easily have been forged.  
So  — unless your [[Financial instrument|instrument]] is a [[deed]] or [[lease]] or has such peculiar formal execution requirements — and most [[confirmation]]s, instructions and even master trading agreements which pass between the operational teams of financial institutions won’t<ref>Exception: anything signed as a [[deed]]: a [[security financial collateral arrangement]], for example, or a [[guarantee]] or a master agreement building a security interest in, such as a [[prime brokerage agreement]]</ref>  — it needn’t be that complicated. Generally, digital signatures are fine and, in many respects, ''better'' than handwritten signatures, especially a scanned, emailed [[facsimile]] of a handwritten signature which could easily have been forged.