RESIDENTS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
It isn’t, obviously, that New Hampshire residents are ''dense'' — or any denser than the rest of us, at any rate — for what they are being shouted at about seems complicated, convoluted and, in honesty, not the sort of thing that calls for such easy exasperation. Indeed, one would need to be quite the scholar in the intricacies of local securities regulation to make much sense of the New Hampshire residents’ notice at all.  
It isn’t, obviously, that New Hampshire residents are ''dense'' — or any denser than the rest of us, at any rate — for what they are being shouted at about seems complicated, convoluted and, in honesty, not the sort of thing that calls for such easy exasperation. Indeed, one would need to be quite the scholar in the intricacies of local securities regulation to make much sense of the New Hampshire residents’ notice at all.  


So perhaps, by contrast, unnatural ''adeptness'' with securities offerings laws characterises the New Hampshireman — so much so that an offeror can feel justified shouting at those who don’t quickly grasp the minutiae.
So perhaps, by contrast, unnatural ''adeptness'' with securities offerings laws characterises the New Hampshireman or woman — so much so that an offeror can feel justified shouting at those who don’t quickly grasp the minutiae.


Or it might be the misconception that this is “important” stuff<ref>Not clear, if the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] is any guide, that a [[disclaimer]] of something for which the disclaiming party was not, in any case, responsible, needs to be said conspicuously. But that is an argument too [[tedious]] even for this contrarian to get into.</ref> that must be said [[conspicuous]]ly, and that means in capitals. But, firstly, no it doesn’t, and secondly, no it isn’t: the usual New Hampshire residents’ disclaimer roundly denies something which no-one was inferring, let alone implying, in the first place:
Or it might be the misconception that this is “important” stuff<ref>Not clear, if the [[Uniform Commercial Code]] is any guide, that a [[disclaimer]] of something for which the disclaiming party was not, in any case, responsible, needs to be said conspicuously. But that is an argument too [[tedious]] even for [[JC|this contrarian]] to get into.</ref> that must be said [[conspicuous]]ly, and that means in capitals. But, firstly, no it doesn’t, and secondly, no it isn’t: the usual New Hampshire residents’ disclaimer roundly denies something which no-one was inferring, let alone implying, in the first place:


:{{NH residents}}
:{{NH residents}}
{{sa}}
*[[Conspicuous]] language and the [[Uniform Commercial Code]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}