83,057
edits
LegalHub: theory: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
First, the manifest failings of [[reg tech]] as we see them present in different ways but boil down to the same thing: ''[[rent-seeking]]''. | First, the manifest failings of [[reg tech]] as we see them present in different ways but boil down to the same thing: ''[[rent-seeking]]''. | ||
Because the provider’s primary interest is its annuity, ''[[iatrogenics|the cure tends, in practice, to be worse than the disease]]''. Furthermore, the [[proprietary]] nature of conventional [[reg tech]] means it is tightly controlled, top-down managed and targeted ''abstractly'' at a ''perceived'' demand and an ''anticipated'' future state,<ref>[[Thought leader]]s are no better at predicting the future of [[Legal services delivery|legal services]] than they have been at anything else.</ref> neither of which will | Because the provider’s primary interest is its annuity, ''[[iatrogenics|the cure tends, in practice, to be worse than the disease]]''. Furthermore, the [[proprietary]] nature of conventional [[reg tech]] means it is tightly controlled, top-down managed and targeted ''abstractly'' at a ''perceived'' demand and an ''anticipated'' future state,<ref>[[Thought leader]]s are no better at predicting the future of [[Legal services delivery|legal services]] than they have been at anything else.</ref> neither of which will neatly address the exact problem a ''specific'' user is trying to solve as that problem develops. Therefore [[reg tech]], if not continually maintained, is innately prone to [[planned obsolescence|unplanned obsolescence]]. And that means ''rent''. | ||
==The problem== | ==The problem== | ||
===[[Rent-seeking]]=== | ===[[Rent-seeking]]=== | ||