No violation: Difference between revisions

413 bytes removed ,  19 December 2020
m
No edit summary
m (Amwelladmin moved page No violation - Representation to No violation)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{repanat|no violation}}
{{repanat|no violation|}}
No, it doesn't make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing warranty that you have not breached this agreement. That is tantamount to a {{repprov|no event of default}} rep — so you should already have it — and as canvassed in that very article, that [[representation]] is  in any case a big old waste of time in any case. If I tell you I have not breached the agreement, but in actual fact I have, in what way are you in a better position than if I didn't tell you that?
{{rep no violation}}
{{sa}}
*{{isdaprov|No Violation or Conflict}} under the {{isdama}}