83,489
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is: | My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is: | ||
{{ | {{tabletop}}{{red|[[code obligation|obligation]] [}} | ||
:{{de|label}} {{{label}}} | :{{de|label}} {{{label}}} | ||
:{{de|who}} {{{who}}} | :{{de|who}} {{{who}}} | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:{{de|how}} {{{how}}} | :{{de|how}} {{{how}}} | ||
:{{de|when}} {{{when}}} | :{{de|when}} {{{when}}} | ||
:{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}}}} | :{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}} | ||
And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare | {{tablebottom}} | ||
And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare: | |||
{{tabletop}} | {{tabletop}} |