83,489
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''The {{isdama}}''' is the basic framework which applies to anyone who touches down on planet ISDA. . There are three existing versions: *the state-of-the-art '''{{2002...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===The {{isdama}}=== | |||
The {{isdama}} is the basic framework which applies to anyone who touches down on planet [[ISDA]]. There are three existing versions: | |||
*the state-of-the-art '''{{2002ma}}''';<ref>There is no such thing as a '''{{2008ma}}'''. That was a joke on our part.</ref> | *the state-of-the-art '''{{2002ma}}''';<ref>There is no such thing as a '''{{2008ma}}'''. That was a joke on our part.</ref> | ||
*the still-popular-with-traditionalists '''{{1992ma}}''', and | *the still-popular-with-traditionalists-and-Americans '''{{1992ma}}''', and | ||
*the all-but-retired-but-don’t-forget-there-are-still-soldiers-in-the-Burmese-jungle '''{{1987ma}}'''<ref>Seriously: proceed with | *the all-but-retired-but-don’t-forget-there-are-still-soldiers-in-the-Burmese-jungle '''{{1987ma}}'''<ref>Seriously: proceed with caution with one of these. {{1987ma}}s don’t have a lot of safety features a modern derivatives counterparty relies on, so only for real specialists and weirdos. Think of it like flying a spitfire rather than a 737 Max. Um, okay, bad {{t|metaphor}}.</ref> | ||
*the interesting-only-for-its-place-in-the-fossil-record-and-witty-acrostic {{1985ma}}; and | |||
*there ''isn’t'' a '''{{2008ma}}'''. That’s a little running [[JC]] in-joke.<ref>Talking to yourself might not be the first sign of madness, but having ''in-jokes'' with yourself might be.</ref> | |||
All three versions have a tri-partite form: '''Pre-printed Master''', '''{{{{{1}}}|Schedule}}''' and — well, ''this'' is controversial: for is it, or is it not, part of the {{isdama}}? — '''[[Credit Support Annex]]'''. | |||