82,966
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===“What if the issuer holds its own note for a bit?”=== | ===“What if the issuer holds its own note for a bit?”=== | ||
Creating a structured product is largely a question of herding a lot of bureaucratic, pedantic and yet strangely wilful cats. | Creating a structured product is largely a question of herding a lot of bureaucratic, pedantic and yet strangely wilful cats. Many things need to be done: agency appointments made, clearing systems set up, instructions matched, hedges struck, collateral acquired | ||
There is something to be said about parking a newly-minted instrument, [[for the time being]], somewhere safe, while you hunt down and tie up extant loose ends. If the instrument is ''issued'' but yet ''out of harm’s way'': in the fridge, so to speak — one can sort out the rest of the formalities in relative tranquillity — at least without the dependencies — before settling the instrument into the market when all cats are at peace and the trade is finally, irrevocably, on. | |||
Who would the best person be to hold the instrument in such a case | Who would the best person be to hold the instrument in such a case? You might think its own issuer. After all: what mischief can come from a fellow’s [[IOU]]s when they are in his own pocket? | ||
Yet his [[Private practice lawyer|counsel]] may instinctively cavil against the idea. | |||
“This, ah, is [[problematic]]. In, er, theory. So to speak. As it were.” | |||
“This, ah, is problematic. In, er, theory. So to speak. As it were.” | |||
“Oh?” | “Oh?” | ||
Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
“Well, there’s the [[debt]]. It might, um, ''merge''.” | “Well, there’s the [[debt]]. It might, um, ''merge''.” | ||
She will be a bit shoe-shuffly about this, the same way Anglicans are shoe-shuffly about the more mystical bits of orthodoxy they are meant to subscribe to, but in practice don’t.<ref>The virgin birth, for example, or the existence of God. “Let us not quible about details, [[Nigel molesworth|molesworth]],” sa rev plum, | She will be a bit shoe-shuffly about this, the same way Anglicans are shoe-shuffly about the more mystical bits of orthodoxy they are meant to subscribe to, but in practice don’t.<ref>The virgin birth, for example, or the existence of God. “Let us not quible about details, [[Nigel molesworth|molesworth]],” sa rev plum the skool chaplane, “it is beter to see this as [[Metaphor|metaphorical]]”.</ref> It is as if there is some [[deep magic]] in play here, but it has somehow become stale, or inert. | ||
=== The theory of “merger” === | === The theory of “merger” === |