Template:M intro repack merger of debt: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===“What if the issuer holds its own note for a bit?”===
===“What if the issuer holds its own note for a bit?”===
Creating a structured product is largely a question of herding a lot of bureaucratic, pedantic and yet strangely wilful cats.  
Creating a structured product is largely a question of herding a lot of bureaucratic, pedantic and yet strangely wilful cats. Many things need to be done: agency appointments made, clearing systems set up, instructions matched, hedges struck, collateral acquired


Some of its many inconveniences could be addressed by parking a newly-minted instrument, for the time being, somewhere safe while you hunt down and immobilise extant felines. If the instrument is ''issued'' but yet ''out of harm’s way'': in the fridge, so to speak — one can sort out oneself and one’s remaining cats in tranquillity before putting the instrument back out to the market when the cats are at peace and it is prudent to do so.  
There is something to be said about parking a newly-minted instrument, [[for the time being]], somewhere safe, while you hunt down and tie up extant loose ends. If the instrument is ''issued'' but yet ''out of harm’s way'': in the fridge, so to speak — one can sort out the rest of the formalities in relative tranquillity — at least without the dependencies — before settling the instrument into the market when all cats are at peace and the trade is finally, irrevocably, on.  


Who would the best person be to hold the instrument in such a case, to keep it on ice?  
Who would the best person be to hold the instrument in such a case? You might think its own issuer. After all: what mischief can come from a fellow’s [[IOU]]s when they are in his own pocket?  


Its own issuer.
Yet his [[Private practice lawyer|counsel]] may instinctively cavil against the idea.  


Yet your [[Private practice lawyer|counsel]] may instinctively cavil against the idea.
“This, ah, is [[problematic]]. In, er, theory. So to speak. As it were.”
 
“This, ah, is problematic. In, er, theory. So to speak. As it were.”


“Oh?”
“Oh?”
Line 16: Line 14:
“Well, there’s the [[debt]]. It might, um, ''merge''.”
“Well, there’s the [[debt]]. It might, um, ''merge''.”


She will be a bit shoe-shuffly about this, the same way Anglicans are shoe-shuffly about the more mystical bits of orthodoxy they are meant to subscribe to, but in practice don’t.<ref>The virgin birth, for example, or the existence of God. “Let us not quible about details, [[Nigel molesworth|molesworth]],” sa rev plum, “i preffer to think of this as [[Metaphor|metaphorical]]”.</ref> It is as if there is some [[deep magic]] in play here, but it has somehow become stale, or inert.
She will be a bit shoe-shuffly about this, the same way Anglicans are shoe-shuffly about the more mystical bits of orthodoxy they are meant to subscribe to, but in practice don’t.<ref>The virgin birth, for example, or the existence of God. “Let us not quible about details, [[Nigel molesworth|molesworth]],” sa rev plum the skool chaplane, “it is beter to see this as [[Metaphor|metaphorical]]”.</ref> It is as if there is some [[deep magic]] in play here, but it has somehow become stale, or inert.


=== The theory of “merger” ===
=== The theory of “merger” ===