Template:First law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:(ii) As the  number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.  
:(ii) As the  number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.  
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br>
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br>
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} proved (“[[occursum ergo es]]”) that to be meaningful, a meeting must have no more than, but fewer than, two people.)
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} asserted its incoherence through his maxim “[[convenimus ergo es]]”).<br>
 
As a consequence of these axioms there is thus a lower ''and'' an upper bound on the number of people possible in a viable meeting of a given duration. <br>