Template:M tldr isda Party A and Party B: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Unlike most finance contracts, swaps were conceived as contracts between equals — “Party A” and “Party B” labels reflect this — either party can be [[long]] or [[short]], or [[In-the-money|in-]] or [[out-of-the-money]] — clerical oversight can be a bitch — most swaps aren’t really contracts of equals — mistaken belief in bilaterality by regulators has arguably concentrated, rather than dissipated, systemic risk.
Unlike most [[finance contract]]<nowiki/>s, swaps were conceived as contracts between equals — hence the labels “Party A” and “Party B” — either side can be [[long]] or [[short]], or [[In-the-money|in-]] or [[out-of-the-money]] — clerical oversight can be a bitch — most swaps aren’t really contracts of equals — mistaken belief in bilaterality arguably concentrates, rather than dissipates, systemic risk.