82,903
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Definitions - ISDA Provision|The]] basic reason for the differences between the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} is: | [[Definitions - ISDA Provision|The]] basic reason for the differences between the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} is: | ||
*The whole {{isda92prov|Loss}}/{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} farrago (and all that {{isda92prov|First Method}} and {{isda92prov|Second Method}} nonsense) is unique to the ’92, replaced by {{ | *The whole {{isda92prov|Loss}}/{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} farrago (and all that {{isda92prov|First Method}} and {{isda92prov|Second Method}} nonsense) is unique to the ’92, replaced by {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}} in the ’02. That is also where {{isda92prov|Reference Market-maker}}s, {{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}s and so on come from. | ||
*{{ | *{{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)(ii)}} is new to the ’02. | ||
*{{ | *{{{{{1}}}|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{{{{1}}}|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it). | ||
*{{ | *{{{{{1}}}|Set-off}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|6(f)}} is new to the ’02. | ||
{{{{{1}}} Section 14 TOC}} |