Template:Isda 14 summ: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Definitions - ISDA Provision|The]] basic reason for the differences between the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} is:
[[Definitions - ISDA Provision|The]] basic reason for the differences between the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} is:
*The whole {{isda92prov|Loss}}/{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} farrago (and all that {{isda92prov|First Method}} and {{isda92prov|Second Method}} nonsense) is unique to the ’92, replaced by {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} in the ’02. That is also where {{isda92prov|Reference Market-maker}}s, {{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}s and so on come from.
*The whole {{isda92prov|Loss}}/{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} farrago (and all that {{isda92prov|First Method}} and {{isda92prov|Second Method}} nonsense) is unique to the ’92, replaced by {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}} in the ’02. That is also where {{isda92prov|Reference Market-maker}}s, {{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}s and so on come from.
*{{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(ii)}} is new to the ’02.
*{{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)(ii)}} is new to the ’02.
*{{isdaprov|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{isdaprov|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it).
*{{{{{1}}}|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{{{{1}}}|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it).
*{{isdaprov|Set-off}} under Section {{isdaprov|6(f)}} is new to the ’02.
*{{{{{1}}}|Set-off}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|6(f)}} is new to the ’02.
{{{{{1}}} Section 14 TOC}}