|
|
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|2(d)|2002|2(d)|1992}} | | {{newisdamanual|2(d)|}} |
| You can revel in the full heft of these provisions at right.
| |
| | |
| Observant and obedient scholars will notice that the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} versions are, [[more or less]], identical. Observant and ''less'' obedient scholars will remark what a pig’s ear the ISDA drafting committee made of a relatively simple concept and, when given a once-in-a-decade opportunity to improve it in 2002, the combined intellectual might of {{tag|ISDA}}, its members, friends, relations and their divers [[mediocre lawyer|counsel]], retinue and entourage, couldn’t.
| |
| | |
| Or didn’t.
| |
| | |
| This is, therefore, [[Q.E.D]], the apex of all possible derivatives drafting. Especially the triple negative in {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}.
| |
| | |
| Make you feel great to be alive, doesn’t it. I bet you wish it could be simplified. Here: let [[me]] have a go.
| |
| | |
| {{nuts|ISDA|Gross-Up}}
| |
| | |
| {{Withholding under ISDA}}
| |