83,357
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In this backgrounder the JC will look deeply | In this backgrounder the JC will look deeply into what is the basic point of an {{isdama }}. What does it do, why do you need one, and why can’t you just crack on and trade swaps without all this dusty paperwork? | ||
Now this might seem like pocket-calculator stuff to you, my seasoned veterans, but it never hurts to stop and ponder what seems to be the bleeding obvious. | |||
Going back to basics is bracing for the spirit. The JC encountered his first {{aies}} fully thirty years ago now — shout out the GFF — and he still finds himself discovering things he didn’t know, or having things dawn upon him. Plenty did, as he prepared this essay. | |||
====On becoming a shibboleth==== | |||
Through habit and inattention we work around the [[affordance]]s of our business. What starts as a practical shortcut — the shortest possible route to market — can, through acquiescent disregard become a sacred cow — a shibboleth — an ''obstacle'' on the road to transaction. So it is with the {{isdama}}. Once precisely an ''[[affordance]]'' —an artefact for quickly tidying up and dispensing with formalities it would be laborious to repeat for every trade — it became a mountain of its own. Sure, you only need to climb it, from the bottom, once, but it has become a three-month climb. And one does not scale an ISDA master agreement the way Alex Honnolt scales El Cap. There is the entire modernist machinery of the multi-national corporation campaign that you must take with you. | |||
There are those who miss the good old days. Where bank legal departments have not legislated outright against them — most have — the temptation now is to ask “must we really have an ISDA? Would not a [[long-form confirmation]] do? | |||
This is how the military-industrial complex of agency operates: it shapeshifts to create work to occupy the available rent.<ref>Remind me to do an article on the [[rent carrying capacity]] of financial services.</ref> | |||
====The three aims of an ISDA==== | |||
The {{isdama}} is, as we know, a framework under which two “[[counterparties]]” can transact [[over-the-counter]] derivatives — [[swap]] contracts. Besides its original appeal as an [[affordance]] it has three main aims: it is a [[relationship contract]]; it is a [[Credit risk mitigation|credit risk management tool]], and it is a [[capital optimisation]] tool. | |||
==== Relationship contract ==== | ==== Relationship contract ==== | ||
[[File:Wedding.jpg|250px|thumb|right|A relationship contract, yesterday.]] | [[File:Wedding.jpg|250px|thumb|right|A relationship contract, yesterday.]] |