|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{a|isda|}} | | {{nman|isda|2002|Innocent Party and Implicated Party}} |
| “{{isdaprov|Innocent Party}}” isn’t a sanctioned ISDA definition, but it should be. It is the [[JC]]’s cheeky shorthand for “a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} or a {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”. We suggest, weakly, that “a {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”, might be an “{{isdaprov|Implicated Party}}”. But no one will listen, so this remains expanded ISDA universe [[fan fiction]].
| |
| | |
| | |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Non-Affected Party}}
| |