Innocent Party and Implicated Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Replaced content with "{{nman|isda|2002|Innocent Party and Implicated Party}}"
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "{{nman|isda|2002|Innocent Party and Implicated Party}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|isda|}}
{{nman|isda|2002|Innocent Party and Implicated Party}}
“{{isdaprov|Innocent Party}}” isn’t a sanctioned ISDA definition, but it should be. It is the [[JC]]’s cheeky shorthand for “a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} or a {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”. We suggest, weakly, that “a {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”, might be an “{{isdaprov|Implicated Party}}”. But no one will listen, so this remains expanded ISDA universe [[fan fiction]].
 
 
{{sa}}
*{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Non-Affected Party}}